Β§9.4–9.5Radiative Transitions; The Reduced Mass Effect

Part V Phillips pp. 194–198 Β· ~14 min read

  • electric dipole transition
  • selection rule
  • metastable state
  • reduced mass

Which lines a spectrum contains is decided by a symmetry, not by an energy. The gaps say what could be emitted; parity says what actually is.

The states of Β§9.2 are stationary β€” left alone, an excited hydrogen atom would stay excited forever. Real atoms emit light. This section turns the electromagnetic field on and asks which transitions can happen, then makes one small correction that turns out to have discovered an isotope.

What drives a transition

The most probable radiative transitions are electric dipole transitions, driven by the interaction of the field E\mathbf E with the electron–nucleus dipole moment d^=βˆ’er^\hat{\mathbf d} = -e\hat{\mathbf r}:

H^I=βˆ’d^β‹…E(9.26)\hat H_I = -\hat{\mathbf d}\cdot\mathbf E\tag{9.26}

and the probability of a transition between states ii and ff is proportional to

∣∫ψnf,lf,mlfβˆ—(r) H^Iβ€‰Οˆni,li,mli(r) d3r∣2(9.27)\left|\int\psi^*_{n_f,l_f,m_{l_f}}(\mathbf r)\,\hat H_I\,\psi_{n_i,l_i,m_{l_i}}(\mathbf r)\,\mathrm d^3\mathbf r\right|^2\tag{9.27}

Equation (9.27) β€” a number that is often exactly zero

symbol
is
the matrix element of the interaction between the two states β€” an overlap, weighted by the perturbation. In linear-algebra terms it is one off-diagonal entry of Δ€_I in the energy basis.
units
type
complex scalar

Click any symbol to see what it is, what units it carries, and what kind of object it is once you put it in an array.

Parity kills most of them

The argument is two lines and needs no integration.

Working through the spherical-harmonic algebra narrows the survivors further β€” the integral vanishes unless lfβˆ’lil_f - l_i is +1+1 or βˆ’1-1 exactly:

Ξ”l=Β±1(9.28)\Delta l = \pm1\tag{9.28}
Fig. 9.8 β€” electric dipole transitions, and the one that cannot happen
label the levels byhover a level to pick out its n
E = 0 β€” ionization; a continuum lies aboveβˆ’E_R/1Β²βˆ’E_R/2Β²βˆ’E_R/3Β²βˆ’E_R/4Β²energyl = 0 (s)l = 1 (p)l = 2 (d)l = 3 (f)l = 4 (g)1s2s3s4s5s2p3p4p5p6p3d4d5d6d7d4f5f6f7f8f5g6g7g8g9g

Labelled by n = nr + l + 1, as in Table 9.1 and Fig. 9.8. Now the aligned levels share a name, and the spectroscopic labels 1s, 2s, 2p, 3d appear. Same diagram, same physics β€” only the bookkeeping changed, and this is the switch the book makes without announcing it. Energies come from Eq. (9.21), not from the drawing, so the alignment is the formula speaking.

Dotted lines are the allowed electric dipole transitions β€” every one steps sideways by exactly one column, because Ξ”l = Β±1. Notice what is missing: nothing connects 2s to 1s, since both have l = 0. That is why the 2s state is metastable.

The spectrum

Transitions can be induced by an external field oscillating at the resonant frequency ℏω=∣Enfβˆ’Eni∣\hbar\omega = |E_{n_f} - E_{n_i}|, absorbing energy when Enf>EniE_{n_f} > E_{n_i} and emitting it otherwise. Spontaneous transitions look uncaused but are not: they are driven by the quantized electromagnetic field, which is present even around a perfectly isolated atom.

Either way the emitted photon carries Eniβˆ’EnfE_{n_i} - E_{n_f}, giving

hcΞ»=ER(1nf2βˆ’1ni2)(9.29)\frac{hc}{\lambda} = E_R\left(\frac{1}{n_f^2} - \frac{1}{n_i^2}\right)\tag{9.29}

The series of Eq. (9.29), now derived rather than asserted

energy (eV)n = 1-13.60Γ—1n = 2-3.40Γ—4n = 3-1.51Γ—9n = 4-0.85Γ—16n = 5-0.54Γ—25n = 6-0.38Γ—36
100 nm200 nm300 nm400 nm500 nm600 nm700 nmUV ←

Click a gold level for its energy and degeneracy.

Click a coloured arrow to see the photon it emits, and watch its line light up in the spectrum.

The same levels and lines this site drew in Β§1.3 β€” from the same data module, so the two pages cannot disagree. Chapter 1 asserted Eq. (1.9); chapter 9 derives it.

The reduced mass effect

One assumption has been quietly load-bearing: that the nucleus stays put. It does not β€” nucleus and electron both orbit their common centre of mass. Writing the classical energy in that frame turns the two-body problem into a one-body one with the reduced mass

ΞΌ=memNme+mN\mu = \frac{m_em_N}{m_e + m_N}

and the quantum problem transforms the same way. So every result so far holds with mem_e replaced by ΞΌ\mu β€” the length scale becomes a0β€²=(me/ΞΌ)a0a_0' = (m_e/\mu)a_0, the energy scale ERβ€²=(ΞΌ/me)ERE_R' = (\mu/m_e)E_R, and

Enβ€²=βˆ’ERβ€²n2=ΞΌme(βˆ’ERn2)(9.30)E_n' = -\frac{E_R'}{n^2} = \frac{\mu}{m_e}\left(-\frac{E_R}{n^2}\right)\tag{9.30}

Where the reduced mass matters most

system⇅$\mu/m_e$⇅effect on the spectrum⇅
hydrogena 0.05% shift β€” invisible unless you have something to compare withβ“˜
deuteriumβ“˜lines 0.18 nm blueward of hydrogen's β€” how Urey found it in 1934
positronium ()β“˜every level at HALF the hydrogen energy; the whole spectrum shifts by a factor of 2
muonic hydrogen ()β“˜levels 186Γ— deeper and the atom 186Γ— smaller β€” X-rays instead of visible light

ΞΌ/m_e departs from 1 in proportion to m_e/m_N, so the effect is largest when the 'nucleus' is light. Click a cell for detail.

Check yourself

0 / 6 answered

  1. 1.Why does an electric dipole transition always change the parity of the state?

  2. In the diagram, switch off β€œobey Ξ”l = Β±1”.

    2.What becomes visible, and what does it tell you about the 2s state?

  3. 3.The 2s state lives 0.14 s while 2p lives 1.6 ns. What does β€œforbidden” mean here?

  4. 4.Why does this page reuse chapter 1's hydrogen data module instead of recomputing the wavelengths?

  5. 5.Deuterium's spectral lines sit 0.18 nm from hydrogen's. Where does that come from?

  6. 6.Positronium is an electron bound to a positron. What does its reduced mass do to the spectrum?