A magnetic moment is what turns an angular momentum into something a laboratory can grip. The field does not change the levels’ existence; it makes them separate enough to see.
§8.1 asserted that a component of angular momentum comes only in integer or half-integer multiples of , and admitted the claim was surprising. This section makes it visible. The route is magnetism: a moving charge is a magnet, a magnet in a field has an orientation energy, and if the angular momentum is quantized then so is that energy — which you can see, because a non-uniform field will sort the atoms in space according to it.
A classical magnet is an orbiting charge
The simplest magnetic moment in classical physics is a charged particle going round in a circle. Its moment turns out to be proportional to its angular momentum:
The derivation is three lines, and worth doing because every quantum formula in this section is a modification of it.
Quantum magnets: the same formula, three corrections
In quantum physics magnetic moments are still proportional to angular momenta, but the angular momenta are now fuzzy vectors — so only has a definite value. Three cases matter, and each modifies Eq. (8.7) differently.
Electron spin carries an extra factor of 2:
Electron orbital motion does not:
A whole atom gets a factor that interpolates between them:
The factor in Eq. (8.10) is the Landé g-factor landé g-factor The dimensionless factor g in an atom's magnetic moment, g = 1 + [j(j+1) − l(l+1) + s(s+1)]/2j(j+1). It equals 2 when the magnetism is due to electron spin alone and 1 when due to orbital motion alone. defined in ch. 8 — open in glossary , and for an atomic state with quantum numbers , and it is
which takes the value when the magnetism is all spin and when it is all orbital.
Two natural units
Equations (8.8)–(8.10) all carry the same combination, so it gets a name — the Bohr magneton bohr magneton μ_B = eħ/2m_e = 9.274×10⁻²⁴ J T⁻¹, the natural unit for magnetic moments associated with electrons. defined in ch. 8 — open in glossary :
Protons and neutrons are composite — they contain quarks and gluons — so their moments are not given by any clean formula. They are measured:
which names a second unit, the nuclear magneton nuclear magneton μ_N = eħ/2m_p = 5.05×10⁻²⁷ J T⁻¹, the natural unit for nuclear magnetic moments — smaller than the Bohr magneton by the mass ratio m_p/m_e ≈ 1836. defined in ch. 8 — open in glossary :
Magnetic energy: a continuum, or a ladder
A classical moment in a field has orientation energy
and taking along ,
Classically can be anything between and , so the energy is a continuum between and . Quantum mechanically is quantized, so the energy is too. Using Eq. (8.10), an atomic state with quantum numbers and has , giving levels:
The book’s Fig. 8.2 draws the ladder for three values of :
The Stern–Gerlach experiment
The Stern–Gerlach experiment stern–gerlach experiment Passing atoms through a non-uniform magnetic field, so each is deflected by a force −μ_z ∂B/∂z and the beam splits into 2j+1 separate beams. Direct evidence that a Cartesian component of angular momentum is quantized; silver atoms split into two, so their ground state has j = ½. defined in ch. 8 — open in glossary turns that energy ladder into a picture. A uniform field would only twist the atoms; the trick is a non-uniform one: if varies with , the energy varies with position, and a position-dependent energy is a force,
Each atom is pushed along by an amount proportional to its own . A classical beam would smear into a continuous band, because could be anything from to . A quantum beam splits into separate beams.
With j = 1/2 the moment has 2 allowed z components, so the beam lands in 2 places. This is the case Stern and Gerlach actually saw. Silver atoms split into two beams, which says j = ½ — and a half-integer j cannot come from orbital motion, so it is spin.
Spin-½ throughout. Each magnet measures the spin along its own axis; block a beam to send only the other one onward.
A measurement snaps the arrow onto its magnet's axis. Two magnets at 90° are perpendicular here too — and knowing one says nothing about the other.
Press the z → x → z surprise: keep only spin-up along z, keep only spin-up along x, then measure z again. Half the atoms come out down — the outcome the first magnet had already filtered away. The x-measurement did not add anything; it destroyed the z-information, because [Ŝx, Ŝz] ≠ 0.
Check yourself
0 / 6 answered
1.Why does a Stern–Gerlach apparatus need a *non-uniform* magnetic field?
In the widget's chained view, press “the z → x → z surprise”.
2.Half the atoms emerge spin-down at the third magnet, even though the first magnet removed every spin-down atom. What happened?
3.Silver's beam splits into two. Why does that establish the existence of *spin* rather than just some angular momentum?
4.The nuclear magneton is about 1836 times smaller than the Bohr magneton. Why?
5.Which statement about the Landé g-factor is correct?
6.Why is the Zeeman effect described as *indirect* evidence for quantized magnetic energies, while Stern–Gerlach is *direct*?