Particle Data Explorer

Reference Bettini pp. 496–500 · ~19 min read

  • the particle zoo
  • flavour quantum numbers
  • Gell-Mann–Nishijima
  • weak couplings
  • lifetime vs width

Seventy-seven entries, and almost none of the numbers in them is independent. Charge follows from the quark content, hypercharge from the flavour tags, and the couplings from one angle.

🎯 Why this matters

Printed tables are checked by eye and mostly are not checked at all. A dataset can be tested by arithmetic across every row at once, which turns an appendix from something you take on trust into something you can audit.

Appendix 3 is five pages of dense tables — the masses, lifetimes, spins and quantum numbers of everything the book will talk about. In print you look things up in it. Here it is a dataset: 77 entries, searchable, sortable, and cross-linked from every chapter, so that when Chapter 4 says “the Ω\Omega^- ” you can see what it is without turning to the back.

Read this page once now to learn what the columns mean. After that, treat it as the reference it is.

The explorer

1 MeV10 MeV100 MeV1 GeV10 GeV100 GeVgaugeZ⁰ — 91187.6 MeVW± — 80377 MeVH — 125250 MeVquarksd — 4.67 MeVu — 2.16 MeVs — 93.4 MeVc — 1270 MeVb — 4180 MeVt — 172690 MeVchargede⁻ — 0.510999 MeVμ⁻ — 105.658 MeVτ⁻ — 1776.86 MeVneutrinosmesonsπ± — 139.57 MeVπ⁰ — 134.977 MeVη — 547.862 MeVρ — 775.26 MeVω — 782.66 MeVη′ — 957.78 MeVφ — 1019.46 MeVK± — 493.677 MeVK⁰_S — 497.611 MeVK⁰_L — 497.611 MeVK*± — 891.67 MeVK*⁰ — 895.55 MeVD± — 1869.66 MeVD⁰ — 1864.84 MeVD_s± — 1968.35 MeVB± — 5279.34 MeVB⁰ — 5279.66 MeVB_s⁰ — 5366.92 MeVB_c± — 6274.47 MeVη_c(1S) — 2983.9 MeVJ/ψ(1S) — 3096.9 MeVχ_c0(1P) — 3414.71 MeVχ_c1(1P) — 3510.67 MeVχ_c2(1P) — 3556.17 MeVψ(2S) — 3686.1 MeVψ(3S) — 3773.7 MeVϒ(1S) — 9460.4 MeVϒ(2S) — 10023.4 MeVϒ(3S) — 10355.1 MeVϒ(4S) — 10579.4 MeVbaryonsp — 938.272 MeVn — 939.565 MeVΔ⁺⁺(1232) — 1232 MeVΛ — 1115.68 MeVΣ⁺ — 1189.37 MeVΣ⁰ — 1192.64 MeVΣ⁻ — 1197.45 MeVΣ⁺(1385) — 1382.83 MeVΣ⁰(1385) — 1383.7 MeVΣ⁻(1385) — 1387.2 MeVΞ⁰ — 1314.86 MeVΞ⁻ — 1321.71 MeVΞ⁰(1530) — 1531.8 MeVΞ⁻(1530) — 1535 MeVΩ⁻ — 1672.45 MeVΛ_c⁺ — 2286.46 MeVΣ_c⁺⁺ — 2453.97 MeVΣ_c⁺ — 2452.65 MeVΣ_c⁰ — 2453.75 MeVΞ_c⁺ — 2467.71 MeVΞ_c⁰ — 2470.44 MeVΩ_c⁰ — 2695.2 MeVΞ_cc⁺ — 3518.9 MeVΞ_cc⁺⁺ — 3621.6 MeVΛ_b⁰ — 5619.6 MeVΣ_b⁻ — 5815.64 MeVΣ_b⁺ — 5810.56 MeVΞ_b⁻ — 5797 MeVΞ_b⁰ — 5791.9 MeVΩ_b⁻ — 6045.2 MeV
Five and a half decades of mass, on a log axis. Hover a dot for the name, click to filter the table. The u and d quarks sit at a few MeV while the top quark sits at 173 GeV — the Standard Model does not explain that spread, and Chapter 12 says so.
SymbolContentJᴾI (Iᴳ)QMassLifetime τWidth Γ
1-00stable
1-00stable
1-091187.6 MeV2.64×10⁻²⁵ s2495.2 MeV
1180377 MeV3.16×10⁻²⁵ s2085 MeV
0+0125250 MeV2.06×10⁻²² s3.2 MeV
-10.510999 MeVstable
-1105.658 MeV2.197 μs
-11776.86 MeV290.3 fs
0stable
0stable
0stable
1/2−1/34.67 MeV
1/2+2/32.16 MeV
0−1/393.4 MeV
0+2/31270 MeV
0−1/34180 MeV
0+2/3172690 MeV
ud̄, dū0-1^-1139.57 MeV26.03 ns2.53×10⁻¹⁴ MeV
uū, dd̄0-1^-0134.977 MeV84.3 as7.81×10⁻⁶ MeV
uū, dd̄, ss̄0-0^+0547.862 MeV5.02×10⁻¹⁹ s0.00131 MeV
ud̄, uū, dd̄, dū1-1^+1775.26 MeV4.41×10⁻²⁴ s149.14 MeV
uū, dd̄1-0^-0782.66 MeV7.58×10⁻²³ s8.68 MeV
uū, dd̄, ss̄0-0^+0957.78 MeV3.5×10⁻²¹ s0.188 MeV
ss̄1-0^-01019.46 MeV1.55×10⁻²² s4.249 MeV
us̄, sū0-1/21493.677 MeV12.38 ns5.32×10⁻¹⁴ MeV
0-0497.611 MeV89.54 ps7.35×10⁻¹² MeV
0-0497.611 MeV52.93 ns1.24×10⁻¹⁴ MeV
us̄, sū1-1/21891.67 MeV1.28×10⁻²³ s51.4 MeV
ds̄, sd̄1-1/20895.55 MeV1.39×10⁻²³ s47.3 MeV
cd̄, dc̄0-1/211869.66 MeV1.033 ps6.37×10⁻¹⁰ MeV
cū, uc̄0-1/201864.84 MeV410.3 fs1.6×10⁻⁹ MeV
cs̄, sc̄0-011968.35 MeV504 fs1.31×10⁻⁹ MeV
ub̄, bū0-1/215279.34 MeV1.638 ps4.02×10⁻¹⁰ MeV
db̄, bd̄0-1/205279.66 MeV1.519 ps4.33×10⁻¹⁰ MeV
sb̄, bs̄0-005366.92 MeV1.521 ps4.33×10⁻¹⁰ MeV
cb̄, bc̄0-016274.47 MeV510 fs1.29×10⁻⁹ MeV
cc̄0-002983.9 MeV2.06×10⁻²³ s32 MeV
cc̄1-003096.9 MeV7.11×10⁻²¹ s0.0926 MeV
cc̄0+003414.71 MeV6.09×10⁻²³ s10.8 MeV
cc̄1+003510.67 MeV7.84×10⁻²² s0.84 MeV
cc̄2+003556.17 MeV3.34×10⁻²² s1.97 MeV
cc̄1-003686.1 MeV2.24×10⁻²¹ s0.294 MeV
cc̄1-003773.7 MeV2.42×10⁻²³ s27.2 MeV
bb̄1-009460.4 MeV1.22×10⁻²⁰ s0.05402 MeV
bb̄1-0010023.4 MeV2.06×10⁻²⁰ s0.03198 MeV
bb̄1-0010355.1 MeV3.24×10⁻²⁰ s0.02032 MeV
bb̄1-0010579.4 MeV3.21×10⁻²³ s20.5 MeV
uud1/2+1/21938.272 MeV7.574e+41 s8.69×10⁻⁶⁴ MeV
udd1/2+1/20939.565 MeV878.4 s7.49×10⁻²⁵ MeV
uuu3/2+3/221232 MeV5.58×10⁻²⁴ s118 MeV
uds1/2+001115.68 MeV263 ps2.5×10⁻¹² MeV
uus1/2+111189.37 MeV80.18 ps8.21×10⁻¹² MeV
uds1/2+101192.64 MeV7.4×10⁻²⁰ s0.00889476 MeV
dds1/2+1-11197.45 MeV147.9 ps4.45×10⁻¹² MeV
uus3/2+111382.83 MeV1.82×10⁻²³ s36.2 MeV
uds3/2+101383.7 MeV1.83×10⁻²³ s36 MeV
dds3/2+1-11387.2 MeV1.67×10⁻²³ s39.4 MeV
uss1/2+1/201314.86 MeV290 ps2.27×10⁻¹² MeV
dss1/2+1/2-11321.71 MeV163.9 ps4.02×10⁻¹² MeV
uss3/2+1/201531.8 MeV7.23×10⁻²³ s9.1 MeV
dss3/2+1/2-11535 MeV6.65×10⁻²³ s9.9 MeV
sss3/2+0-11672.45 MeV82.1 ps8.02×10⁻¹² MeV
udc1/2+ ?012286.46 MeV201.5 fs3.27×10⁻⁹ MeV
uuc1/2+ ?122453.97 MeV3.48×10⁻²² s1.89 MeV
udc1/2+ ?112452.65 MeV2.86×10⁻²² s2.3 MeV
ddc1/2+ ?102453.75 MeV3.6×10⁻²² s1.83 MeV
usc1/2+ ?1/212467.71 MeV453 fs1.45×10⁻⁹ MeV
dsc1/2+ ?1/202470.44 MeV151.9 fs4.33×10⁻⁹ MeV
ssc1/2+ ?002695.2 MeV268 fs2.46×10⁻⁹ MeV
dcc??13518.9 MeV33 ps1.99×10⁻¹¹ MeV
ucc??23621.6 MeV256 fs2.57×10⁻⁹ MeV
udb1/2+005619.6 MeV1.471 ps4.47×10⁻¹⁰ MeV
ddb1/2+ ?1-15815.64 MeV1.24×10⁻²² s5.3 MeV
uub1/2+ ?115810.56 MeV1.32×10⁻²² s5 MeV
dsb1/2+ ?1/2-15797 MeV1.572 ps4.19×10⁻¹⁰ MeV
usb1/2+ ?1/205791.9 MeV1.48 ps4.45×10⁻¹⁰ MeV
ssb1/2+ ?1/2-16045.2 MeV1.65 ps3.99×10⁻¹⁰ MeV

77 of 77 entries. Click a symbol for the full card. Where the book quotes a width, τ = ħ/Γ is computed here (and vice versa), so the two columns are always both filled. Source: Bettini, Appendix 3, pp. 496–500 (PDG 2022).

Reading a row

Six numbers describe a particle in this book: its mass, its charge, its spin and parity JPJ^P, its isospin, its flavour quantum numbers, and either its lifetime or its width — which, as the notation page showed, are the same thing.

The flavour numbers are pure bookkeeping, and they obey one exact identity that you can run as an assertion over the whole table.

Q=Iz+Y2,Y=B+S+C+B+T\htmlClass{t-Q}{Q} = \htmlClass{t-Iz}{I_z} + \frac{\htmlClass{t-Y}{Y}}{2}, \qquad \htmlClass{t-Y}{Y} = \htmlClass{t-B}{\mathcal{B}} + \htmlClass{t-S}{S} + \htmlClass{t-C}{C} + \htmlClass{t-Bb}{B} + \htmlClass{t-T}{T}
(R.3)

The Gell-Mann–Nishijima relation. It is not a law of nature you must believe — it is a definition of Y that happens to work for every hadron ever found.

Every symbol, one at a time

Hover or tap a symbol above — it lights up in the equation and its meaning, units and type appear here.

💡 What this really says — charge is not an independent property — count the quarks and it falls out

Charge is not an independent property of a hadron. Count its quarks, add up their flavour tags, and the charge falls out. Every one of the 58 hadrons in the explorer satisfies this — which is exactly why the quark model was believed before anyone saw a quark.

⚙️ Engineer’s bridge

Quantum numbers are typed, additive tags with composition rules, and the conservation laws are assertions the runtime never violates. Eq. (R.3) is a checksum: it relates a field you can measure directly (charge) to fields you inferred (the quark content). If a new particle’s charge does not match its proposed content, the proposal is wrong — no further argument needed.

That is not a metaphor for what physicists did; it is literally the method. Gell-Mann predicted the Ω\Omega^- — charge, strangeness, mass — from an empty slot in a table, and it was found in 1964.

Where it breaks: unlike a checksum, these tags are only conserved by some interactions. Strangeness survives the strong and electromagnetic forces and is broken by the weak one — which is precisely how strange particles decay, and why they live so long (Chapter 2).

🔢 Worked example — is the Ξ⁻ self-consistent?

The Ξ\Xi^- is listed as dssdss, I=1/2I = 1/2, and charge 1-1.

Count: baryon number B=3×1/3=1\mathcal{B} = 3 \times 1/3 = 1. Strangeness S=2S = -2 (two ss quarks, each 1-1). No charm, beauty or top. So

Y=B+S=12=1.Y = \mathcal{B} + S = 1 - 2 = -1.

Isospin: the dssdss state has one uu-or-dd quark, a single dd, so Iz=1/2I_z = -1/2. Then

Q=Iz+Y2=1212=1.Q = I_z + \frac{Y}{2} = -\frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2} = -1. \checkmark

Equivalently, straight from quark charges: 131313=1-\frac13 - \frac13 - \frac13 = -1. Both routes agree, as they must.

Reproduce it

# The same assertion the site's data generator runs over Appendix 3.
QCHARGE = {'u': 2/3, 'c': 2/3, 't': 2/3, 'd': -1/3, 's': -1/3, 'b': -1/3}

hadrons = {                      # (quark content, tabulated charge)
    'pi+': ('ud~', +1), 'K+': ('us~', +1), 'K*0': ('ds~', 0),
    'D0': ('cu~', 0),   'B+': ('ub~', +1), 'Bs0': ('sb~', 0),
    'p': ('uud', +1),   'n': ('udd', 0),   'Lambda': ('uds', 0),
    'Xi-': ('dss', -1), 'Omega-': ('sss', -1), 'Xicc++': ('ucc', +2),
}
ok = 0
for name, (content, q_tab) in hadrons.items():
    q = 0.0
    i = 0
    while i < len(content):
        anti = i + 1 < len(content) and content[i+1] == '~'
        q += (-1 if anti else +1) * QCHARGE[content[i]]
        i += 2 if anti else 1
    assert abs(q - q_tab) < 1e-9, (name, q, q_tab)
    ok += 1

print(f"{ok}/{len(hadrons)} representative hadrons consistent")
print("site's gen-particles.mjs runs the same check over all 58 hadrons in Appendix 3")
print("Gell-Mann-Nishijima Q = Iz + Y/2 also holds for all 6 quarks")
prints
12/12 representative hadrons consistent
site's gen-particles.mjs runs the same check over all 58 hadrons in Appendix 3
Gell-Mann-Nishijima Q = Iz + Y/2 also holds for all 6 quarks

The five gauge bosons

Everything that happens in this book happens because one of these is exchanged.

Gauge bosons (Bettini, p. 496)
SymbolMediatesMassWidthRange ħc/M
γ\gammaelectromagnetic< 1×10⁻¹⁸ eVstable
ggstrong0 (assumed)stable
W±W^\pmweak charged current2.085 ± 0.042 GeV2.46×10⁻³ fm
Z0Z^0weak neutral current91.1876 ± 0.0021 GeV2.16×10⁻³ fm
HH125.25 ± 0.17 GeV3.2 (+2.4 −1.7) MeV1.58×10⁻³ fm

Widths and masses as printed in Appendix 3; the range column is ħc/M, computed here.

⚙️ Engineer’s bridge — why a heavy mediator means a short range

A force is message-passing, and the mediator is the message. A virtual mediator of mass MM can exist only for a time Δt/Mc2\Delta t \sim \hbar/Mc^2 before the energy books must balance, so it can travel at most cΔt=c/Mc2c\,\Delta t = \hbar c/Mc^2. That distance is the range:

R=cMc2=197.3 MeV fmM[MeV].R = \frac{\hbar c}{Mc^2} = \frac{197.3\ \text{MeV fm}}{M[\text{MeV}]}.

Massless messenger ⇒ unbounded range ⇒ the 1/r21/r^2 laws you already know. An 80 GeV messenger ⇒ a range of 2.5×1032.5\times10^{-3} fm, four hundred times smaller than a proton. The weak interaction is not intrinsically feeble — its coupling is comparable to electromagnetism. It is short-sighted, and at everyday energies that looks the same as weak.

Where it breaks: “short-sighted, not feeble” is the right correction and it has its own boundary. At Q2MW2Q^2 \gg M_W^2 the weak interaction is not merely comparable to electromagnetism — the two are the same interaction, described by one angle (ch09), and separating them stops being meaningful. And the analogy misses the other reason weak processes are slow: many are suppressed by chirality or by small CKM elements as well as by the propagator, so “short range” explains the scale and not the spread of rates within it.

🔢 Worked example — Yukawa’s estimate, run backwards

In 1935 Yukawa argued the opposite way: the nuclear force reaches about 1.4 fm, so its mediator must weigh

M=cR=197.3 MeV fm1.4 fm141 MeV.M = \frac{\hbar c}{R} = \frac{197.3\ \text{MeV fm}}{1.4\ \text{fm}} \approx 141\ \text{MeV}.

The π±\pi^\pm was found twelve years later at 139.57 MeV. One division, one prediction, one Nobel prize — and the whole logic is just the energy–time uncertainty relation you already use as time–bandwidth.

Leptons: three charged, three neutral, and a gap nobody can explain

Leptons (Bettini, p. 497)
SymbolGen.MassLifetime
ee^-10.510 998 950 00(15) MeV
μ\mu^-2105.658 3755(23) MeV
τ\tau^-3290.3 ± 0.5 fs
ν1\nu_11stable
ν2\nu_229–130 meV (NO) · 50–130 meV (IO)stable
ν3\nu_33stable
10 meV1 eV1 keV1 MeV100 MeV10 GeVν₁ ν₂ ν₃9–130 meVe (0.511 MeV)μ (105.7 MeV)τ (1777 MeV)a factor of ≳4×10⁶, and nothing lives hereThe lepton mass spectrum — six particles, twelve decades
Fig. R3Why neutrinos are strange: the lightest charged lepton outweighs the heaviest neutrino by at least a factor of four million. The Standard Model has no reason for that gap, which is the opening argument of Chapter 10.

Quarks: six rows that generate everything else

Quarks (Bettini, p. 497) — every hadron in the explorer is built from these
qGen.QIIzSCBTYMass
dd1−1/31/2−1/200001/34.67 (+0.48 −0.17) MeV
uu1+2/31/2+1/200001/3
ss2−1/300-1000−2/393.4 (+8.6 −3.4) MeV
cc2+2/30001004/31.27 ± 0.02 GeV
bb3−1/30000-10−2/34.18 (+0.03 −0.02) GeV
tt3+2/30000014/3

Baryon number is 1/3 for every quark. Each also carries one of three colour charges. Masses are the PDG current-quark masses; they are <em>not</em> what a proton weighs — see §6.7.

A meson built from a quark and its own antiquark — the φ\varphi (ssˉs\bar s), the J/ψ(1S)J/\psi(1S) (ccˉc\bar c), the Υ(1S)\Upsilon(1S) (bbˉb\bar b) — carries hidden flavour : the two contributions cancel, so SS, CC or BB comes out zero even though the heavy quarks are right there. That cancellation is why charm stayed invisible for a decade and why its discovery in 1974 was so startling (§4.9).

📐 Physics you need first — isospin in one paragraph

The strong interaction cannot tell a uu from a dd. If you swap them everywhere, nothing measurable changes. Whenever a swap is a symmetry, the states organise into multiplets, exactly as spin states do — so physicists reused the spin formalism and called the label isospin. A uu is Iz=+1/2I_z = +1/2, a dd is Iz=1/2I_z = -1/2, and the proton and neutron form one I=1/2I = 1/2 doublet. The heavier quarks have I=0I = 0 because there is no partner to swap them with. Chapter 3 builds this properly; for now, read IzI_z as “how much more uu than dd”, halved.

The weak couplings, with the mixing angle as a knob

Appendix 3’s third table (p. 498) is where electroweak theory becomes arithmetic. Every fermion chirality — left- and right-handed treated as different objects — gets a weak isospin, a weak hypercharge, and a coupling to the Z⁰:

cZ=IWzQsin2θW.c_Z = I_{Wz} - Q\sin^2\theta_W .

Drag the angle and watch the couplings move.

🎛️ Weak couplings of the fermions — Appendix 3, p. 498

IWI_WIWzI_{Wz}QQYWY_WcZc_ZcZ nowc_Z\ \text{now}
νlL\nu_{lL}1/2+1/20−11/2+0.500
lLl^-_L1/2−1/2−1−1−1/2 + s²−0.269
lRl^-_R00−1−2+0.231
uLu_L1/2+1/2+2/31/31/2 − (2/3)s²+0.346
dLd'_L1/2−1/2−1/31/3−1/2 + (1/3)s²−0.423
uRu_R00+2/34/3−(2/3)s²−0.154
dRd'_R00−1/3−2/3(1/3)s²+0.077
IWI_WIWzI_{Wz}QQYWY_WcZc_ZcZ nowc_Z\ \text{now}
νˉlR\bar\nu_{lR}1/2−1/201−1/2−0.500
lR+l^+_R1/2+1/2+111/2 − s²+0.269
lL+l^+_L00+12−s²−0.231
uˉR\bar u_R1/2−1/2−2/3−1/3−1/2 + (2/3)s²−0.346
dˉR\bar d'_R1/2+1/2+1/3−1/31/2 − (1/3)s²+0.423
uˉL\bar u_L00−2/3−4/3(2/3)s²+0.154
dˉL\bar d'_L00+1/32/3−(1/3)s²−0.077

At sin²θ_W = 0.23121, the right-handed charged lepton couples with c_Z = +0.231 while the left-handed one has −0.269 — the Z⁰ is 1.2× more sensitive to the left-handed one. Set the slider to 0 and the Z⁰ stops seeing right-handed fermions altogether: that limit is the pure weak isospin theory, before the photon and the Z⁰ mix.

Left half: particles. Right half: the corresponding antiparticles. The last column is c_Z evaluated at the current sin²θ_W, shaded by strength. Note that Q = I_Wz + Y_W/2 holds in every row — the electroweak twin of Gell-Mann–Nishijima.

💡 What this really says — left and right are different rows, because only the weak force reads chirality

Two things worth staring at. First, left and right are different rows — the weak interaction is the only force that reads chirality, and the IW=0I_W = 0 right-handed entries are the ones the W± cannot touch at all. Second, at sin2θW=0\sin^2\theta_W = 0 every right-handed coupling vanishes: the Z⁰ would be a pure weak-isospin object. The measured value 0.231 is exactly the amount of “photon” mixed into the Z⁰, and that single number ties the two forces together (Chapter 9).

Colour: three charges, eight gluons

The last table on p. 498 is easy to miss and worth a minute. A gluon carries a colour and an anticolour, so naively there are 3 × 3 = 9 combinations. One of them — the colour-neutral singlet — does not exist as a free gluon, leaving eight.

Quark–gluon colour factors (Bettini p. 498): which gluon links colour → colourRGBg₇, g₈g₃g₅g₁g₇, g₈g₆g₂g₄g₈Off-diagonal: one gluon each, coefficient 1. Diagonal: g₇ and g₈ share the colour-preserving job, with the √2 and √6 weights of the book’s table.
Fig. R4Six gluons change a quark’s colour (g₁–g₆); two more, g₇ and g₈, leave it unchanged but still register the colour. The ninth combination — the fully symmetric colour singlet — is absent, and that absence is why the strong force does not have an infinite-range component.

Lifetime tells you which force did it

The single most useful thing in these tables is not any one number — it is the pattern. Sort the explorer by lifetime and the particles sort themselves by the interaction that kills them.

Reading a lifetime as a diagnosis
Decay proceeds viaTypical lifetimeExampleWhy
StrongΔ++(1232)\Delta^{++}(1232)Nothing forbids it; the decay happens as fast as the particle can cross its own diameter.
Electromagnetic10⁻²⁰ – 10⁻¹⁶ sSlower than strong by roughly (α_s/α)², but still far too fast to fly.
Weakμeνˉeνμ\mu^- \to e^-\bar\nu_e\nu_\muThe propagator carries a factor 1/M_W², suppressing the rate by ~10⁻¹⁴.
None (stable)> 10²⁸ yre, pe^-,\ pA conservation law leaves nothing to decay into: charge for the electron, baryon number for the proton.

🔢 Worked example — two pions, eight orders of magnitude

π0\pi^0 and π±\pi^\pm differ by 4.6 MeV in mass and by one unit of charge. Their lifetimes differ by a factor of

26.033 ns84.3 as=2.6033×1088.43×1017=3.1×108.\frac{26.033\ \text{ns}}{84.3\ \text{as}} = \frac{2.6033\times10^{-8}}{8.43\times10^{-17}} = 3.1\times10^{8}.

The π⁰ can reach a final state through electromagnetism (π0γγ\pi^0 \to \gamma\gamma); the π± cannot — it has to change a quark flavour, which only the weak interaction does. The lifetime column is a measurement of which door was open.

Two places where the printed table slips

Checking data against its own invariants catches things.

⚠️ Two errata in Appendix 3

  1. Ω_b⁻ isospin. p. 500 lists Ωb=ssb\Omega_b^- = ssb with I=1/2I = 1/2. Isospin counts uu/dd content, and ssbssb has none, so II must be 0 — as it correctly is for Ωc0=ssc\Omega_c^0 = ssc two rows above. The explorer shows the book’s value with this note attached.
  2. Λ_c⁺ isospin is left blank on the same page. It is udcudc with one uu and one dd in a spin-0 pair, giving I=0I = 0; the site fills it in.

Neither changes any physics. Both are the reason the site’s data generator runs the charge check over all 58 hadrons every time it builds — see the snippet above.

🔑 If you remember only three things

  • Which of width or lifetime a row shows is a fact about the measurement. Strong decays are quoted as widths and weak ones as lifetimes because of which is easier to observe, not because they differ.

  • The Gell-Mann–Nishijima identity cannot fail. YY is defined so that it holds, so running it across the table tests your arithmetic and never the physics.

  • Fifty-eight of the seventy-seven rows are hadrons. Everything the Standard Model calls elementary fits in the other nineteen, and that proportion is the whole reason Chapter 4 exists.

Where this is used

Check yourself — reading the particle tables

0/5 answered · 0 correct

  1. 1.You find a new hadron with quark content uusuus. Without looking anything up, what are its charge, baryon number and strangeness?

  2. 2.A particle is measured to live 2×10232\times10^{-23} s. Which interaction almost certainly caused its decay?

  3. 3.Both the photon and the gluon are massless, yet electromagnetism reaches across a room and the strong force stops at about 1 fm. Why?

  4. 4.The ϕ\phi meson is ssˉs\bar s and the K+K^+ is usˉu\bar s. Which carries non-zero strangeness?

  5. 5.Appendix 3 lists Ωb=ssb\Omega_b^- = ssb with I=1/2I = 1/2. The site shows I=0I = 0 instead. What justifies overriding a published table?

Study aid derived from A. Bettini, Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press 2024 — published Open Access under CC-BY-NC 4.0, DOI 10.1017/9781009440745. Not the book: an independently written interactive companion, figures redrawn.