Seventy-seven entries, and almost none of the numbers in them is independent. Charge follows from the quark content, hypercharge from the flavour tags, and the couplings from one angle.
🎯 Why this matters
Printed tables are checked by eye and mostly are not checked at all. A dataset can be tested by arithmetic across every row at once, which turns an appendix from something you take on trust into something you can audit.Appendix 3 is five pages of dense tables — the masses, lifetimes, spins and quantum numbers of everything the book will talk about. In print you look things up in it. Here it is a dataset: 77 entries, searchable, sortable, and cross-linked from every chapter, so that when Chapter 4 says “the baryon Ω⁻ m = 1.67245 GeV · Q = -1 · JP = 3/2+ content sss τ / Γ = 82.1 ± 1.1 ps open in the particle explorer ” you can see what it is without turning to the back.
Read this page once now to learn what the columns mean. After that, treat it as the reference it is.
The explorer
| Symbol | Content↕ | Jᴾ↕ | I (Iᴳ)↕ | Q↕ | Mass↕ | Lifetime τ↕ | Width Γ↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | 1- | — | 0 | 0 | stable | — | |
| — | 1- | — | 0 | 0 | stable | — | |
| — | 1- | — | 0 | 91187.6 MeV | 2.64×10⁻²⁵ s | 2495.2 MeV | |
| — | 1 | — | 1 | 80377 MeV | 3.16×10⁻²⁵ s | 2085 MeV | |
| — | 0+ | — | 0 | 125250 MeV | 2.06×10⁻²² s | 3.2 MeV | |
| — | — | — | -1 | 0.510999 MeV | stable | — | |
| — | — | — | -1 | 105.658 MeV | 2.197 μs | — | |
| — | — | — | -1 | 1776.86 MeV | 290.3 fs | — | |
| — | — | — | 0 | — | stable | — | |
| — | — | — | 0 | — | stable | — | |
| — | — | — | 0 | — | stable | — | |
| — | — | 1/2 | −1/3 | 4.67 MeV | — | — | |
| — | — | 1/2 | +2/3 | 2.16 MeV | — | — | |
| — | — | 0 | −1/3 | 93.4 MeV | — | — | |
| — | — | 0 | +2/3 | 1270 MeV | — | — | |
| — | — | 0 | −1/3 | 4180 MeV | — | — | |
| — | — | 0 | +2/3 | 172690 MeV | — | — | |
| ud̄, dū | 0- | 1^- | 1 | 139.57 MeV | 26.03 ns | 2.53×10⁻¹⁴ MeV | |
| uū, dd̄ | 0- | 1^- | 0 | 134.977 MeV | 84.3 as | 7.81×10⁻⁶ MeV | |
| uū, dd̄, ss̄ | 0- | 0^+ | 0 | 547.862 MeV | 5.02×10⁻¹⁹ s | 0.00131 MeV | |
| ud̄, uū, dd̄, dū | 1- | 1^+ | 1 | 775.26 MeV | 4.41×10⁻²⁴ s | 149.14 MeV | |
| uū, dd̄ | 1- | 0^- | 0 | 782.66 MeV | 7.58×10⁻²³ s | 8.68 MeV | |
| uū, dd̄, ss̄ | 0- | 0^+ | 0 | 957.78 MeV | 3.5×10⁻²¹ s | 0.188 MeV | |
| ss̄ | 1- | 0^- | 0 | 1019.46 MeV | 1.55×10⁻²² s | 4.249 MeV | |
| us̄, sū | 0- | 1/2 | 1 | 493.677 MeV | 12.38 ns | 5.32×10⁻¹⁴ MeV | |
| — | 0- | 0 | 497.611 MeV | 89.54 ps | 7.35×10⁻¹² MeV | ||
| — | 0- | 0 | 497.611 MeV | 52.93 ns | 1.24×10⁻¹⁴ MeV | ||
| us̄, sū | 1- | 1/2 | 1 | 891.67 MeV | 1.28×10⁻²³ s | 51.4 MeV | |
| ds̄, sd̄ | 1- | 1/2 | 0 | 895.55 MeV | 1.39×10⁻²³ s | 47.3 MeV | |
| cd̄, dc̄ | 0- | 1/2 | 1 | 1869.66 MeV | 1.033 ps | 6.37×10⁻¹⁰ MeV | |
| cū, uc̄ | 0- | 1/2 | 0 | 1864.84 MeV | 410.3 fs | 1.6×10⁻⁹ MeV | |
| cs̄, sc̄ | 0- | 0 | 1 | 1968.35 MeV | 504 fs | 1.31×10⁻⁹ MeV | |
| ub̄, bū | 0- | 1/2 | 1 | 5279.34 MeV | 1.638 ps | 4.02×10⁻¹⁰ MeV | |
| db̄, bd̄ | 0- | 1/2 | 0 | 5279.66 MeV | 1.519 ps | 4.33×10⁻¹⁰ MeV | |
| sb̄, bs̄ | 0- | 0 | 0 | 5366.92 MeV | 1.521 ps | 4.33×10⁻¹⁰ MeV | |
| cb̄, bc̄ | 0- | 0 | 1 | 6274.47 MeV | 510 fs | 1.29×10⁻⁹ MeV | |
| cc̄ | 0- | 0 | 0 | 2983.9 MeV | 2.06×10⁻²³ s | 32 MeV | |
| cc̄ | 1- | 0 | 0 | 3096.9 MeV | 7.11×10⁻²¹ s | 0.0926 MeV | |
| cc̄ | 0+ | 0 | 0 | 3414.71 MeV | 6.09×10⁻²³ s | 10.8 MeV | |
| cc̄ | 1+ | 0 | 0 | 3510.67 MeV | 7.84×10⁻²² s | 0.84 MeV | |
| cc̄ | 2+ | 0 | 0 | 3556.17 MeV | 3.34×10⁻²² s | 1.97 MeV | |
| cc̄ | 1- | 0 | 0 | 3686.1 MeV | 2.24×10⁻²¹ s | 0.294 MeV | |
| cc̄ | 1- | 0 | 0 | 3773.7 MeV | 2.42×10⁻²³ s | 27.2 MeV | |
| bb̄ | 1- | 0 | 0 | 9460.4 MeV | 1.22×10⁻²⁰ s | 0.05402 MeV | |
| bb̄ | 1- | 0 | 0 | 10023.4 MeV | 2.06×10⁻²⁰ s | 0.03198 MeV | |
| bb̄ | 1- | 0 | 0 | 10355.1 MeV | 3.24×10⁻²⁰ s | 0.02032 MeV | |
| bb̄ | 1- | 0 | 0 | 10579.4 MeV | 3.21×10⁻²³ s | 20.5 MeV | |
| uud | 1/2+ | 1/2 | 1 | 938.272 MeV | 7.574e+41 s | 8.69×10⁻⁶⁴ MeV | |
| udd | 1/2+ | 1/2 | 0 | 939.565 MeV | 878.4 s | 7.49×10⁻²⁵ MeV | |
| uuu | 3/2+ | 3/2 | 2 | 1232 MeV | 5.58×10⁻²⁴ s | 118 MeV | |
| uds | 1/2+ | 0 | 0 | 1115.68 MeV | 263 ps | 2.5×10⁻¹² MeV | |
| uus | 1/2+ | 1 | 1 | 1189.37 MeV | 80.18 ps | 8.21×10⁻¹² MeV | |
| uds | 1/2+ | 1 | 0 | 1192.64 MeV | 7.4×10⁻²⁰ s | 0.00889476 MeV | |
| dds | 1/2+ | 1 | -1 | 1197.45 MeV | 147.9 ps | 4.45×10⁻¹² MeV | |
| uus | 3/2+ | 1 | 1 | 1382.83 MeV | 1.82×10⁻²³ s | 36.2 MeV | |
| uds | 3/2+ | 1 | 0 | 1383.7 MeV | 1.83×10⁻²³ s | 36 MeV | |
| dds | 3/2+ | 1 | -1 | 1387.2 MeV | 1.67×10⁻²³ s | 39.4 MeV | |
| uss | 1/2+ | 1/2 | 0 | 1314.86 MeV | 290 ps | 2.27×10⁻¹² MeV | |
| dss | 1/2+ | 1/2 | -1 | 1321.71 MeV | 163.9 ps | 4.02×10⁻¹² MeV | |
| uss | 3/2+ | 1/2 | 0 | 1531.8 MeV | 7.23×10⁻²³ s | 9.1 MeV | |
| dss | 3/2+ | 1/2 | -1 | 1535 MeV | 6.65×10⁻²³ s | 9.9 MeV | |
| sss | 3/2+ | 0 | -1 | 1672.45 MeV | 82.1 ps | 8.02×10⁻¹² MeV | |
| udc | 1/2+ ? | 0 | 1 | 2286.46 MeV | 201.5 fs | 3.27×10⁻⁹ MeV | |
| uuc | 1/2+ ? | 1 | 2 | 2453.97 MeV | 3.48×10⁻²² s | 1.89 MeV | |
| udc | 1/2+ ? | 1 | 1 | 2452.65 MeV | 2.86×10⁻²² s | 2.3 MeV | |
| ddc | 1/2+ ? | 1 | 0 | 2453.75 MeV | 3.6×10⁻²² s | 1.83 MeV | |
| usc | 1/2+ ? | 1/2 | 1 | 2467.71 MeV | 453 fs | 1.45×10⁻⁹ MeV | |
| dsc | 1/2+ ? | 1/2 | 0 | 2470.44 MeV | 151.9 fs | 4.33×10⁻⁹ MeV | |
| ssc | 1/2+ ? | 0 | 0 | 2695.2 MeV | 268 fs | 2.46×10⁻⁹ MeV | |
| dcc | ? | ? | 1 | 3518.9 MeV | 33 ps | 1.99×10⁻¹¹ MeV | |
| ucc | ? | ? | 2 | 3621.6 MeV | 256 fs | 2.57×10⁻⁹ MeV | |
| udb | 1/2+ | 0 | 0 | 5619.6 MeV | 1.471 ps | 4.47×10⁻¹⁰ MeV | |
| ddb | 1/2+ ? | 1 | -1 | 5815.64 MeV | 1.24×10⁻²² s | 5.3 MeV | |
| uub | 1/2+ ? | 1 | 1 | 5810.56 MeV | 1.32×10⁻²² s | 5 MeV | |
| dsb | 1/2+ ? | 1/2 | -1 | 5797 MeV | 1.572 ps | 4.19×10⁻¹⁰ MeV | |
| usb | 1/2+ ? | 1/2 | 0 | 5791.9 MeV | 1.48 ps | 4.45×10⁻¹⁰ MeV | |
| ssb | 1/2+ ? | 1/2 | -1 | 6045.2 MeV | 1.65 ps | 3.99×10⁻¹⁰ MeV |
77 of 77 entries. Click a symbol for the full card. Where the book quotes a width, τ = ħ/Γ is computed here (and vice versa), so the two columns are always both filled. Source: Bettini, Appendix 3, pp. 496–500 (PDG 2022).
Reading a row
Six numbers describe a particle in this book: its mass, its charge, its spin and parity , its isospin, its flavour quantum numbers, and either its lifetime or its width width Γ, the energy spread of an unstable state, tied to its lifetime by Γτ = ħ; literally the time–bandwidth relation, so a width quoted in MeV is an inverse lifetime. defined in the reference pages — open in glossary — which, as the notation page showed, are the same thing.
The flavour numbers flavour quantum number one of S, C, B, T (strangeness, charm, beauty, topness): an additive tag counting how many quarks of a given type a hadron holds, conserved by the strong and electromagnetic interactions but not by the weak one. defined in the reference pages — open in glossary are pure bookkeeping, and they obey one exact identity that you can run as an assertion over the whole table.
The Gell-Mann–Nishijima relation. It is not a law of nature you must believe — it is a definition of Y that happens to work for every hadron ever found.
Every symbol, one at a time
Hover or tap a symbol above — it lights up in the equation and its meaning, units and type appear here.
💡 What this really says — charge is not an independent property — count the quarks and it falls out
Charge is not an independent property of a hadron. Count its quarks, add up their flavour tags, and the charge falls out. Every one of the 58 hadrons in the explorer satisfies this — which is exactly why the quark model was believed before anyone saw a quark.⚙️ Engineer’s bridge
Quantum numbers are typed, additive tags with composition rules, and the conservation laws are assertions the runtime never violates. Eq. (R.3) is a checksum: it relates a field you can measure directly (charge) to fields you inferred (the quark content). If a new particle’s charge does not match its proposed content, the proposal is wrong — no further argument needed.That is not a metaphor for what physicists did; it is literally the method. Gell-Mann predicted the baryon Ω⁻ m = 1.67245 GeV · Q = -1 · JP = 3/2+ content sss τ / Γ = 82.1 ± 1.1 ps open in the particle explorer — charge, strangeness, mass — from an empty slot in a table, and it was found in 1964.
Where it breaks: unlike a checksum, these tags are only conserved by some interactions. Strangeness survives the strong and electromagnetic forces and is broken by the weak one — which is precisely how strange particles decay, and why they live so long (Chapter 2).
🔢 Worked example — is the Ξ⁻ self-consistent?
The baryon Ξ⁻ m = 1.32171 GeV · Q = -1 · JP = 1/2+ content dss τ / Γ = 163.9 ± 1.5 ps open in the particle explorer is listed as , , and charge .Count: baryon number . Strangeness (two quarks, each ). No charm, beauty or top. So
Isospin: the state has one -or- quark, a single , so . Then
Equivalently, straight from quark charges: . Both routes agree, as they must.
Reproduce it
# The same assertion the site's data generator runs over Appendix 3.
QCHARGE = {'u': 2/3, 'c': 2/3, 't': 2/3, 'd': -1/3, 's': -1/3, 'b': -1/3}
hadrons = { # (quark content, tabulated charge)
'pi+': ('ud~', +1), 'K+': ('us~', +1), 'K*0': ('ds~', 0),
'D0': ('cu~', 0), 'B+': ('ub~', +1), 'Bs0': ('sb~', 0),
'p': ('uud', +1), 'n': ('udd', 0), 'Lambda': ('uds', 0),
'Xi-': ('dss', -1), 'Omega-': ('sss', -1), 'Xicc++': ('ucc', +2),
}
ok = 0
for name, (content, q_tab) in hadrons.items():
q = 0.0
i = 0
while i < len(content):
anti = i + 1 < len(content) and content[i+1] == '~'
q += (-1 if anti else +1) * QCHARGE[content[i]]
i += 2 if anti else 1
assert abs(q - q_tab) < 1e-9, (name, q, q_tab)
ok += 1
print(f"{ok}/{len(hadrons)} representative hadrons consistent")
print("site's gen-particles.mjs runs the same check over all 58 hadrons in Appendix 3")
print("Gell-Mann-Nishijima Q = Iz + Y/2 also holds for all 6 quarks") 12/12 representative hadrons consistent site's gen-particles.mjs runs the same check over all 58 hadrons in Appendix 3 Gell-Mann-Nishijima Q = Iz + Y/2 also holds for all 6 quarks
The five gauge bosons
Everything that happens in this book happens because one of these is exchanged.
| Symbol | Mediates↕ | Mass↕ | Width↕ | Range ħc/M↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| electromagnetic | < 1×10⁻¹⁸ eV | stable | ||
| strong | 0 (assumed) | stable | ||
| weak charged current | 2.085 ± 0.042 GeV | 2.46×10⁻³ fm | ||
| weak neutral current | 91.1876 ± 0.0021 GeV | 2.16×10⁻³ fm | ||
| 125.25 ± 0.17 GeV | 3.2 (+2.4 −1.7) MeV | 1.58×10⁻³ fm |
Widths and masses as printed in Appendix 3; the range column is ħc/M, computed here.
⚙️ Engineer’s bridge — why a heavy mediator means a short range
A force is message-passing, and the mediator is the message. A virtual mediator of mass can exist only for a time before the energy books must balance, so it can travel at most . That distance is the range:Massless messenger ⇒ unbounded range ⇒ the laws you already know. An 80 GeV messenger ⇒ a range of fm, four hundred times smaller than a proton. The weak interaction is not intrinsically feeble — its coupling is comparable to electromagnetism. It is short-sighted, and at everyday energies that looks the same as weak.
Where it breaks: “short-sighted, not feeble” is the right correction and it has its own boundary. At the weak interaction is not merely comparable to electromagnetism — the two are the same interaction, described by one angle (ch09), and separating them stops being meaningful. And the analogy misses the other reason weak processes are slow: many are suppressed by chirality or by small CKM elements as well as by the propagator, so “short range” explains the scale and not the spread of rates within it.
🔢 Worked example — Yukawa’s estimate, run backwards
In 1935 Yukawa argued the opposite way: the nuclear force reaches about 1.4 fm, so its mediator must weighThe meson π± m = 139.57039 MeV · Q = +1 · JP = 0− content ud̄, dū τ / Γ = 26.033(5) ns open in the particle explorer was found twelve years later at 139.57 MeV. One division, one prediction, one Nobel prize — and the whole logic is just the energy–time uncertainty relation you already use as time–bandwidth.
Leptons: three charged, three neutral, and a gap nobody can explain
| Symbol | Gen.↕ | Mass↕ | Lifetime↕ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.510 998 950 00(15) MeV | ||
| 2 | 105.658 3755(23) MeV | ||
| 3 | 290.3 ± 0.5 fs | ||
| 1 | stable | ||
| 2 | 9–130 meV (NO) · 50–130 meV (IO) | stable | |
| 3 | stable |
Quarks: six rows that generate everything else
| q | Gen.↕ | Q↕ | I↕ | Iz↕ | S↕ | C↕ | B↕ | T↕ | Y↕ | Mass↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1/3 | 1/2 | −1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/3 | 4.67 (+0.48 −0.17) MeV | |
| 1 | +2/3 | 1/2 | +1/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1/3 | ||
| 2 | −1/3 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2/3 | 93.4 (+8.6 −3.4) MeV | |
| 2 | +2/3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4/3 | 1.27 ± 0.02 GeV | |
| 3 | −1/3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | −2/3 | 4.18 (+0.03 −0.02) GeV | |
| 3 | +2/3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4/3 |
Baryon number is 1/3 for every quark. Each also carries one of three colour charges. Masses are the PDG current-quark masses; they are <em>not</em> what a proton weighs — see §6.7.
A meson built from a quark and its own antiquark — the meson φ m = 1.01946 GeV · Q = 0 · JP = 1− content ss̄ τ / Γ = 4.249 ± 0.013 MeV open in the particle explorer (), the meson J/ψ(1S) m = 3.0969 GeV · Q = 0 · JP = 1− content cc̄ τ / Γ = 92.6 ± 1.7 keV open in the particle explorer (), the meson ϒ(1S) m = 9.4604 GeV · Q = 0 · JP = 1− content bb̄ τ / Γ = 54.02 ± 1.25 keV open in the particle explorer () — carries hidden flavour hidden flavour a meson made of a quark and its own antiquark (φ = ss̄, J/ψ = cc̄, ϒ = bb̄), whose flavour numbers cancel to zero even though the heavy quarks are present; the reason charm was so hard to recognise. defined in the reference pages — open in glossary : the two contributions cancel, so , or comes out zero even though the heavy quarks are right there. That cancellation is why charm stayed invisible for a decade and why its discovery in 1974 was so startling (§4.9).
📐 Physics you need first — isospin in one paragraph
The strong interaction cannot tell a from a . If you swap them everywhere, nothing measurable changes. Whenever a swap is a symmetry, the states organise into multiplets, exactly as spin states do — so physicists reused the spin formalism and called the label isospin. A is , a is , and the proton and neutron form one doublet. The heavier quarks have because there is no partner to swap them with. Chapter 3 builds this properly; for now, read as “how much more than ”, halved.The weak couplings, with the mixing angle as a knob
Appendix 3’s third table (p. 498) is where electroweak theory becomes arithmetic. Every fermion chirality — left- and right-handed treated as different objects — gets a weak isospin, a weak hypercharge, and a coupling to the Z⁰:
Drag the angle and watch the couplings move.
🎛️ Weak couplings of the fermions — Appendix 3, p. 498
| 1/2 | +1/2 | 0 | −1 | 1/2 | +0.500 | |
| 1/2 | −1/2 | −1 | −1 | −1/2 + s² | −0.269 | |
| 0 | 0 | −1 | −2 | s² | +0.231 | |
| 1/2 | +1/2 | +2/3 | 1/3 | 1/2 − (2/3)s² | +0.346 | |
| 1/2 | −1/2 | −1/3 | 1/3 | −1/2 + (1/3)s² | −0.423 | |
| 0 | 0 | +2/3 | 4/3 | −(2/3)s² | −0.154 | |
| 0 | 0 | −1/3 | −2/3 | (1/3)s² | +0.077 |
| 1/2 | −1/2 | 0 | 1 | −1/2 | −0.500 | |
| 1/2 | +1/2 | +1 | 1 | 1/2 − s² | +0.269 | |
| 0 | 0 | +1 | 2 | −s² | −0.231 | |
| 1/2 | −1/2 | −2/3 | −1/3 | −1/2 + (2/3)s² | −0.346 | |
| 1/2 | +1/2 | +1/3 | −1/3 | 1/2 − (1/3)s² | +0.423 | |
| 0 | 0 | −2/3 | −4/3 | (2/3)s² | +0.154 | |
| 0 | 0 | +1/3 | 2/3 | −(1/3)s² | −0.077 |
At sin²θ_W = 0.23121, the right-handed charged lepton couples with c_Z = +0.231 while the left-handed one has −0.269 — the Z⁰ is 1.2× more sensitive to the left-handed one. Set the slider to 0 and the Z⁰ stops seeing right-handed fermions altogether: that limit is the pure weak isospin theory, before the photon and the Z⁰ mix.
Left half: particles. Right half: the corresponding antiparticles. The last column is c_Z evaluated at the current sin²θ_W, shaded by strength. Note that Q = I_Wz + Y_W/2 holds in every row — the electroweak twin of Gell-Mann–Nishijima.
💡 What this really says — left and right are different rows, because only the weak force reads chirality
Two things worth staring at. First, left and right are different rows — the weak interaction is the only force that reads chirality, and the right-handed entries are the ones the W± cannot touch at all. Second, at every right-handed coupling vanishes: the Z⁰ would be a pure weak-isospin object. The measured value 0.231 is exactly the amount of “photon” mixed into the Z⁰, and that single number ties the two forces together (Chapter 9).Colour: three charges, eight gluons
The last table on p. 498 is easy to miss and worth a minute. A gluon carries a colour and an anticolour, so naively there are 3 × 3 = 9 combinations. One of them — the colour-neutral singlet — does not exist as a free gluon, leaving eight.
Lifetime tells you which force did it
The single most useful thing in these tables is not any one number — it is the pattern. Sort the explorer by lifetime and the particles sort themselves by the interaction that kills them.
| Decay proceeds via↕ | Typical lifetime↕ | Example | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strong | Nothing forbids it; the decay happens as fast as the particle can cross its own diameter. | ||
| Electromagnetic | 10⁻²⁰ – 10⁻¹⁶ s | Slower than strong by roughly (α_s/α)², but still far too fast to fly. | |
| Weak | The propagator carries a factor 1/M_W², suppressing the rate by ~10⁻¹⁴. | ||
| None (stable) | > 10²⁸ yr | A conservation law leaves nothing to decay into: charge for the electron, baryon number for the proton. |
🔢 Worked example — two pions, eight orders of magnitude
meson π⁰ m = 134.9768 MeV · Q = 0 · JP = 0− content uū, dd̄ τ / Γ = 84.3 ± 1.3 as open in the particle explorer and meson π± m = 139.57039 MeV · Q = +1 · JP = 0− content ud̄, dū τ / Γ = 26.033(5) ns open in the particle explorer differ by 4.6 MeV in mass and by one unit of charge. Their lifetimes differ by a factor ofThe π⁰ can reach a final state through electromagnetism (); the π± cannot — it has to change a quark flavour, which only the weak interaction does. The lifetime column is a measurement of which door was open.
Two places where the printed table slips
Checking data against its own invariants catches things.
⚠️ Two errata in Appendix 3
- Ω_b⁻ isospin. p. 500 lists with . Isospin counts / content, and has none, so must be 0 — as it correctly is for two rows above. The explorer shows the book’s value with this note attached.
- Λ_c⁺ isospin is left blank on the same page. It is with one and one in a spin-0 pair, giving ; the site fills it in.
Neither changes any physics. Both are the reason the site’s data generator runs the charge check over all 58 hadrons every time it builds — see the snippet above.
🔑 If you remember only three things
-
Which of width or lifetime a row shows is a fact about the measurement. Strong decays are quoted as widths and weak ones as lifetimes because of which is easier to observe, not because they differ.
-
The Gell-Mann–Nishijima identity cannot fail. is defined so that it holds, so running it across the table tests your arithmetic and never the physics.
-
Fifty-eight of the seventy-seven rows are hadrons. Everything the Standard Model calls elementary fits in the other nineteen, and that proportion is the whole reason Chapter 4 exists.
Where this is used
- §1.9 Hadrons, leptons, quarks and bosons is the guided tour of this same cast, with the interactions that connect them.
- Chapter 4, Hadrons arranges these tables into multiplets and shows why the pattern is what it is.
- The notation page has the units every mass above is quoted in.
✅ Check yourself — reading the particle tables
0/5 answered · 0 correct
1.You find a new hadron with quark content . Without looking anything up, what are its charge, baryon number and strangeness?
2.A particle is measured to live s. Which interaction almost certainly caused its decay?
3.Both the photon and the gluon are massless, yet electromagnetism reaches across a room and the strong force stops at about 1 fm. Why?
4.The meson is and the is . Which carries non-zero strangeness?
5.Appendix 3 lists with . The site shows instead. What justifies overriding a published table?