Notation, Natural Units & Fundamental Constants

Reference Bettini pp. 494–495 · ~22 min read

  • natural units
  • ħ = c = 1
  • ħc = 197.3 MeV fm
  • fundamental constants
  • symbol conventions

Every equation in this book is written inside conventions that are set once and never mentioned again. Putting the units back takes exactly two constants.

🎯 Why this matters

A convention that is never restated is one you cannot check against. Every dimensional sanity check you would run on an engineering formula is unavailable until ħ and c are put back, which is how a wrong exponent survives into print unnoticed.

Open this book at any page and you will find an equation like E2=p2+m2E^2 = p^2 + m^2. Read it as an engineer and it is nonsense: you cannot add a momentum squared to a mass squared. Open it a page later and a particle has “a mass of 125 GeV” — an energy — and “a width of 2.5 GeV” — which is somehow a lifetime. Nothing here is sloppy. The whole book runs in a unit system where those statements are exact, and this page is where you learn it, because every other page assumes it.

This page is the toolkit: the unit convention, the two constants that undo it, the numbers from Appendices 1 and 2, and the symbol table for the whole site. Keep it open in a second tab.

The problem: three units for one thing

Write relativistic energy–momentum the way SI demands, and then again the way this book writes it:

SI — three different units, two conversion factorsE² = p²c² + m²c⁴(kg m/s)² (m/s)²kg² (m/s)⁴Natural units — one unit, no conversion factorsE² = p² + m²GeV²
Fig. R1The same physics. The bottom line is what you will read for the next 500 pages.

The second line is not an approximation and it is not lazy. It is the statement that c and ħ are conversion factors, not physics — and that you may choose units in which they equal 1.

⚙️ Engineer’s bridge

You already do this. In DSP you stop writing frequencies in hertz and start writing them as ω=2πf/fs\omega = 2\pi f / f_s, normalised to the sample rate — and suddenly the Nyquist limit is just π\pi instead of fs/2f_s/2. In power engineering you switch to per-unit, and impedances stop carrying ohms. In both cases you picked a reference so that a recurring conversion factor becomes 1. Natural units do exactly that with cc and \hbar.

Where the analogy breaks: normalised frequency is dimensionless because you divided by something with the same dimension. Here you are declaring that seconds and metres were never independent dimensions to begin with — relativity says they are the same axis, so a conversion factor between them is as arbitrary as the factor between inches and feet.

Step 1: set c = 1

Special relativity says space and time are one geometry. If they are, measuring them in different units (metres and seconds) is a historical accident — like measuring a rectangle’s width in inches and its height in centimetres. Setting

c=299792458 m/s1c = 299\,792\,458\ \text{m/s} \equiv 1

declares one second and 2.998×1082.998 \times 10^8 metres to be the same length. Immediately:

  • velocities become dimensionless — a velocity is β=v/c\beta = v/c, a pure number between 1-1 and 11, which is why the book writes β\beta everywhere;
  • E=mc2E = mc^2 becomes E=mE = m, so a mass is an energy. The proton is “0.938 GeV”, full stop;
  • momentum pp, energy EE and mass mm all carry the same unit, which is what makes E2=p2+m2E^2 = p^2 + m^2 legal.

Step 2: set ħ = 1

Quantum mechanics ties energy to frequency by E=ωE = \hbar\omega and momentum to inverse wavelength by p=kp = \hbar k. Setting

=1.054571817×1034 J s1\hbar = 1.054\,571\,817 \times 10^{-34}\ \text{J s} \equiv 1

declares an energy and an inverse time to be the same quantity. Now:

  • a time is an inverse energy, so a lifetime τ\tau and a width Γ=/τ\Gamma = \hbar/\tau are the same information written two ways;
  • a length is an inverse energy too (via p=kp = \hbar k), so “1 GeV” is also a distance scale;
  • angular momentum and action become pure numbers, which is why spins are quoted as 1/21/2, 11, 3/23/2 rather than as /2\hbar/2.

💡 What this really says — one unit left in the whole subject, and everything is a power of it

After both steps there is exactly one unit left in all of particle physics, and by convention it is the electronvolt (in practice GeV). Every quantity you will meet is some power of it. That is not a notational trick — it is the reason a single number, an energy, can answer “how heavy?”, “how short-lived?”, “how small?” and “how likely?” at once.

Everything is a power of energy

What each quantity becomes when ħ = c = 1
QuantitySI unitNatural unitsTypical value in this book
Energy, mass, momentumJ, kg, kg m s⁻¹proton 0.938 GeV
Time, lengths, mproton radius 0.84 fm = 4.3 GeV⁻¹
Cross-section (area)pp total ≈ 110 mb
Velocitym s⁻¹dimensionlessβ = v/c ∈ (−1, 1)
Angular momentum, action, spinJ sdimensionlessspin 1/2, 1, 3/2
s⁻¹GeV¹Z⁰ width 2.4952 GeV
ForceNGeV²string tension ≈ 0.9 GeV²
Energy densityJ m⁻³GeV⁴QCD vacuum ≈ (0.24 GeV)⁴
Luminositycm⁻² s⁻¹GeV³LHC 2×10³⁴ cm⁻² s⁻¹
Electric chargeCe = √(4πα) ≈ 0.303

Undoing it: the only two constants you need

You will eventually want an answer in metres, seconds or barns. Two numbers do all of that work, and the book prints both in Appendix 2 as exact.

ħc turns an energy into a length

c=197.3269804 MeVfm\htmlClass{t-hbar}{\hbar}\,\htmlClass{t-c}{c} = 197.326\,980\,4\ \htmlClass{t-mev}{\text{MeV}}\,\htmlClass{t-fm}{\text{fm}}
(R.1)

Exact by definition since the 2019 SI redefinition — ħ and c are both defined numbers.

Every symbol, one at a time

Hover or tap a symbol above — it lights up in the equation and its meaning, units and type appear here.

💡 What this really says — big energy means small distance, which is why every accelerator exists

Multiply any energy by nothing and read it as an inverse length. The number 197.3 MeV fm is the exchange rate. Because it is a product, big energy ⇒ small distance: the only way to see something small is to hit it hard. Every accelerator in this book exists because of that one line.

🔢 Worked example — how hard must you hit a proton to see it?

The proton’s charge radius is r0.84r \approx 0.84 fm. To resolve a structure of size rr you need a momentum transfer of at least

Qcr=197.327 MeV fm0.84 fm=235 MeV.Q \sim \frac{\hbar c}{r} = \frac{197.327\ \text{MeV fm}}{0.84\ \text{fm}} = 235\ \text{MeV}.

So a few hundred MeV is the entry ticket to nuclear structure, and the GeV machines of Chapter 1 are what it takes to look inside the proton. Sanity check: 235 MeV is a quarter of the proton’s own mass — the right order, not a factor of a thousand out.

(ħc)² turns an inverse energy squared into a cross-section

(c)2=389.3793721 GeV2μbarn(\htmlClass{t-hbarc}{\hbar c})^2 = 389.379\,372\,1\ \htmlClass{t-gev2}{\text{GeV}^2}\,\htmlClass{t-ub}{\mu\text{barn}}
(R.2)

Square Eq. (R.1) and convert fm² to barns — this is the constant that makes cross-sections computable.

Every symbol, one at a time

Hover or tap a symbol above — it lights up in the equation and its meaning, units and type appear here.

⚠️ Erratum in the printed book

Appendix 2 (p. 495) prints (c)2=389.3793271(\hbar c)^2 = 389.379\,327\,1 GeV² μbarn. Square the book’s own c=197.3269804\hbar c = 197.326\,980\,4 MeV fm and you get 389.3793721389.379\,372\,1 — the digits 372 and 327 are transposed in the table. The Particle Data Group value is 0.38937937210.389\,379\,372\,1 GeV² mbarn, confirming it. This site uses the correct value everywhere, and it is a fair warning: a constants table is data, and data has typos. Cross-check constants against each other — (c)2(\hbar c)^2 must equal c\hbar c squared.

🔢 Worked example — a real cross-section, end to end

The pointlike QED cross-section for e+eμ+μe^+e^- \to \mu^+\mu^- (derived in §5.7) is

σ=4πα23s,\sigma = \frac{4\pi\alpha^2}{3s},

with α=1/137.036\alpha = 1/137.036 and ss the squared centre-of-mass energy. At s=10\sqrt{s} = 10 GeV, so s=100s = 100 GeV²:

σ=4π3(1/137.036)2100 GeV2=2.231×106 GeV2.\sigma = \frac{4\pi}{3}\frac{(1/137.036)^2}{100\ \text{GeV}^2} = 2.231 \times 10^{-6}\ \text{GeV}^{-2}.

That is the answer the theory gives, and it is in inverse GeV squared. Multiply by (c)2(\hbar c)^2:

σ=2.231×106×389.379 μb=8.69×104 μb=0.869 nb.\sigma = 2.231 \times 10^{-6} \times 389.379\ \mu\text{b} = 8.69\times10^{-4}\ \mu\text{b} = 0.869\ \text{nb}.

This is the famous "86.8 nb/s[GeV2]86.8\ \text{nb} / s[\text{GeV}^2]" that Chapter 6 divides by to define the ratio RR. You have just computed the denominator of one of the most important plots in the book, from first principles, in two lines.

Reproduce it

import numpy as np

hbar_c   = 197.3269804e-3      # GeV fm   (exact, App. 2)
hbar     = 6.582119569e-25     # GeV s    (exact, App. 2)
hbarc2   = hbar_c**2 / 100 * 1e6   # GeV^2 ub   (1 b = 100 fm^2 = 1e6 ub)
alpha    = 1 / 137.035999166

print(f"hbar*c            = {hbar_c:.10g} GeV fm")
print(f"(hbar*c)^2        = {hbarc2:.10g} GeV^2 ub   (book prints 389.3793271 - typo)")
print(f"Q to resolve 0.84 fm = {hbar_c / 0.84 * 1000:.1f} MeV")

sigma_gev2 = 4 * np.pi * alpha**2 / (3 * 100.0)        # GeV^-2 at sqrt(s)=10 GeV
print(f"sigma(ee->mumu) at 10 GeV = {sigma_gev2 * hbarc2 * 1e3:.4f} nb")  # 1 ub = 1e3 nb

print(f"Z0 lifetime from Gamma = {hbar / 2.4952:.4e} s")
print(f"proton mass       = {0.938272088 * 1.7826619216e-27:.6e} kg")
print(f"300 K             = {300 * 8.617333262e-14 * 1e12:.2f} meV")
prints
hbar*c            = 0.1973269804 GeV fm
(hbar*c)^2        = 389.3793719 GeV^2 ub   (book prints 389.3793271 - typo)
Q to resolve 0.84 fm = 234.9 MeV
sigma(ee->mumu) at 10 GeV = 0.8685 nb
Z0 lifetime from Gamma = 2.6379e-25 s
proton mass       = 1.672622e-27 kg
300 K             = 25.85 meV

Try it: the converter

Everything above, as a knob. Type a number, pick a unit, and watch the same quantity in every other unit — including the natural-unit power of GeV. For an energy it also shows you the length, time and area that energy is.

⚖️ Natural-units converter

= 1 GeV
  • eV1.00000 × 10
  • keV1.00000 × 10
  • MeV1000
  • GeV1
  • TeV0.001
  • J1.60218 × 10⁻¹⁰
  • kg1.78266 × 10⁻²⁷
  • K1.16045 × 10¹³

…and the same number read as a length, a time and an area

  • ħc / E = 0.197327 fm— the smallest distance this energy can resolve
  • ħ / E = 6.58212 × 10⁻²⁵ s— the lifetime of a state of that width
  • (ħc)² / E² = 389.379 μb— the cross-section scale it sets

ħ = c = 1 makes E, m and p one dimension. Back to SI: m = E/c², T = E/k.

Appendix 2 — the constants themselves

Transcribed from p. 495. Click any cell with a dotted underline for what the constant is and where the book uses it. Note the exact column: since the 2019 SI redefinition, several of these are not measurements at all.

Fundamental constants (Bettini, Appendix 2, p. 495)
QuantitySymbolValueUncertainty (ppb)
Speed of light in vacuumccexact
Planck constanthhexact
Planck constant, reduced\hbarexact
Conversion constantc\hbar cexact
Conversion constant(c)2(\hbar c)^2exact
Elementary chargeqeq_eexact
Electron massmem_e9.109 383 7015(28) × 10⁻³¹ kg = 0.510 998 950 00 MeV0.30
Proton massmpm_p1.672 621 923 69(51) × 10⁻²⁷ kg = 938.272 088 16 MeV0.31
μB=qe/2me\mu_B = q_e\hbar/2m_e5.788 381 8060(17) × 10⁻¹¹ MeV T⁻¹0.30
μN=qe/2mp\mu_N = q_e\hbar/2m_p3.152 451 258 44(96) × 10⁻¹⁴ MeV T⁻¹0.31
a=4πε02/meqe2a = 4\pi\varepsilon_0\hbar^2/m_e q_e^20.529 177 210 903(80) × 10⁻¹⁰ m0.15
1 / fine structure constantα1(0)\alpha^{-1}(0)0.11
Newton constantGNG_N6.674 30(15) × 10⁻¹¹ m³ kg⁻¹ s⁻²
Fermi constantGF/(c)3G_F/(\hbar c)^3510
Weak mixing anglesin2θW(MZ)\sin^2\theta_W(M_Z)1.7 × 10⁵
Strong coupling constantαs(MZ)\alpha_s(M_Z)7.6 × 10⁶
Avogadro numberNAN_A6.022 140 76 × 10²³ mol⁻¹exact
Boltzmann constantkkexact

Values from CODATA 2018 (Tiesinga <em>et al.</em>, Rev. Mod. Phys. <strong>93</strong> 025010, 2021); α from Fan <em>et al.</em> (2023); G<sub>F</sub>, α<sub>s</sub> and sin²θ<sub>W</sub> from the Particle Data Group (Workman <em>et al.</em> 2022). Uncertainties are one standard deviation on the last digits, in parts per 10⁹.

⚙️ Engineer’s bridge — why “exact” is not a brag

Seven entries above are exact. Not “measured very precisely” — exact, with no uncertainty at all, because in 2019 the SI was redefined to fix c, h, q_e, N_A and k at chosen numerical values and derive the metre, kilogram, ampere, mole and kelvin from them.

This is the same move as choosing a fixed-point format. You do not measure how many volts one LSB is; you define the full-scale reference and everything else is counted in units of it. The physics did not change in 2019; the direction of the definition did. And it is why c\hbar c can be quoted to unlimited digits while the proton mass cannot: one is arithmetic, the other is an experiment.

Where it breaks: “exact by definition” and “known to unlimited digits” are not the same claim, and the SI redefinition blurs them. c\hbar c is exact because \hbar and cc are fixed numbers — but a mass expressed in kilograms is now traceable to those same fixed constants through an apparatus with a real uncertainty, so exactness in the definition does not propagate into the measurement. What became arithmetic is the conversion; the weighing is still an experiment, and the proton’s mass is uncertain at 101010^{-10} for reasons no definition can remove.

Orders of magnitude — the map you should carry

Every energy in this book is somewhere on this line, and by ħc every energy is also a distance. Read it in both directions.

meVeVkeVMeVGeVTeVPeVroom T (26 meV)visible light (2 eV)X-rays, atomic bindingelectron mass (0.511 MeV)proton (0.938 GeV)W, Z, top, Higgs (10² GeV)LHC beam (6.8 TeV)…and the same axis read as a distance, via ħc / E0.2 mm0.2 μm0.2 nm200 fm0.2 fm2×10⁻⁴ fm2×10⁻⁷ fmatom (10⁻¹⁰ m)nucleus (few fm)inside the proton (<0.1 fm)energy up ⇒ distance down: the entire justification for building bigger machines
Fig. R2Six orders of magnitude of energy are six orders of magnitude of resolution. The Bohr radius sits at keV, the nucleus at MeV, the proton’s interior above a GeV.

The symbols this book uses

Particle physics ran out of letters decades ago. This table is the site-wide convention; every chapter obeys it.

Site-wide notation (frozen — see build_state/SITE_SPEC.md)
SymbolMeansGroupWatch out for
QQElectric charge, in units of the elementary chargeflavour±1/3, ±2/3 for quarks; always an integer for hadrons
I, IzI,\ I_zStrong isospin and its third componentflavourAn SU(2) label over (u, d) only — not the weak isospin below
S, C, B, TS,\ C,\ B,\ TStrangeness, charm, beauty, topflavourSign convention: the s quark has S = −1, the b quark B = −1
B\mathcal{B}Baryon number, 1/3 per quarkflavourWritten B in the book — do not confuse with beauty B
YYStrong hypercharge, Y = 𝓑 + S + C + B + TflavourOne axis of every SU(3) weight diagram
JPJ^PSpin and parity of a statestatee.g. the pion is 0⁻, the ρ is 1⁻
IGI^GIsospin and G-parity (mesons only)stateG-parity is C combined with an isospin rotation (§3.10)
IW, IWz, YWI_W,\ I_{Wz},\ Y_WWeak isospin, its third component, weak hyperchargeelectroweakLeft- and right-handed components of the same fermion differ — that is the whole point
cZ=IWzQs2c_Z = I_{Wz} - Q s^2Z⁰ coupling factor, with s² ≡ sin²θ_WelectroweakCh. 9 uses it constantly
α, αs\alpha,\ \alpha_sElectromagnetic and strong coupling constantsdynamicsBoth run with Q²; always ask “at what scale?”
GFG_FFermi constantdynamicsUnits GeV⁻² — a contact interaction
Γ, τ\Gamma,\ \tauWidth and lifetime, Γτ = ħdynamicsQuoted interchangeably; a width in MeV is an inverse lifetime
σ\sigmaCross-sectiondynamicsAlso a Pauli matrix, also a Σ hyperon, also a standard deviation
β, γ\beta,\ \gammav/c and the Lorentz factor (1−β²)^(−1/2)kinematicsγ is also the photon and also a Dirac matrix γ^μ
s\sqrt{s}Centre-of-mass energykinematicss is a Mandelstam invariant (§1.4), not a strange quark here
ν1,ν2,ν3\nu_1,\nu_2,\nu_3Neutrino mass eigenstatesneutrinoDistinct from the flavour eigenstates ν_e, ν_μ, ν_τ — Ch. 10 lives on that difference
Kˉ0, uˉ\bar{K}^0,\ \bar{u}Antiparticles carry an overbarconventionOn this site they are drawn outlined, never filled

Greek letters, and the overloading problem

Appendix 1 is just the alphabet. The useful version is knowing which glyph is overloaded — because the book will not warn you.

Appendix 1 (p. 494), plus what each letter means in this book
LowerUpperNameUsed in this book for
αΑalphafine-structure constant; α_s; an α particle (⁴He nucleus)
βΒbetav/c; β decay
γΓgammaphoton; Lorentz factor; Dirac matrices γ^μ — and uppercase Γ is a decay width
δΔdeltaCP-violating phase δ; uppercase Δ is the 3/2 baryon and also “difference” (Δm²)
εΕepsilonCP-violation parameters ε, ε′; polarization vector
ζΖzetarare — but Z⁰ (Latin Z) is everywhere
ηΗetathe η and η′ mesons
θ, ϑΘthetascattering angle; θ_W weak mixing angle; θ_C Cabibbo; θ₁₂, θ₁₃, θ₂₃ neutrino mixing
ιΙiotarare
κΚkappaanomalous coupling parameters (Ch. 9)
λΛlambdawavelength; Gell-Mann matrices λ_a; Wolfenstein λ — uppercase Λ is the hyperon and Λ_QCD
μΜmuthe muon; a magnetic moment; the prefix micro (μb)
νΝnuneutrino (always, in this book)
ξΞxiuppercase Ξ is the cascade hyperon
οΟomicronnot used — too close to zero
πΠpithe pion; and 3.14159…
ρΡrhothe ρ meson; a density; Wolfenstein ρ̄
σ, ςΣsigmacross-section; Pauli matrices; a standard deviation — uppercase Σ is the hyperon and a sum
τΤtauthe τ lepton; a lifetime
υΥ, ϒupsilonuppercase ϒ is the bb̄ bottomonium state
ϕ, φΦphithe ϕ meson; an azimuthal angle; a scalar field
χΧchithe χ_c charmonium states; chirality; a χ² fit statistic
ψΨpsithe J/ψ and ψ′; a wave function
ωΩomegathe ω meson; an angular frequency — uppercase Ω is the Ω⁻ baryon and a solid angle

🔑 If you remember only three things

  • A width is a lifetime. 2.5 GeV is not an energy spread to widen a cut around — it is a particle that lives 2.6×10252.6\times10^{-25} s.

  • GeV2^{-2} is an area, not a slip. A cross-section carries two inverse powers of energy, and the factor that turns it into barns is where (ħc)2(ħc)^2 is hiding.

  • Powers of energy do not tell you which quantity you have. A mass, a momentum, a temperature and an inverse length all read as GeV, so the units can never catch a mistake the way they would elsewhere.

Where this is used

Check yourself — units and notation

0/5 answered · 0 correct

  1. 1.A paper reports a new resonance with a width Γ=10\Gamma = 10 MeV. Roughly how long does it live?

    Hint: =6.58×1022\hbar = 6.58 \times 10^{-22} MeV s.

  2. 2.Why can c\hbar c be quoted as exactly 197.3269804197.3269804\ldots MeV fm, while the proton mass carries an uncertainty?

  3. 3.In the converter above, set the dimension to Energy and type 1 GeV. Which of the following will it show?

  4. 4.A theorist hands you a cross-section as the pure number σ=104\sigma = 10^{-4} GeV2^{-2}. What is it in barns?

    Hint: (c)2=389.4(\hbar c)^2 = 389.4 GeV² μbarn.

  5. 5.The book's Appendix 2 prints (c)2=389.3793271(\hbar c)^2 = 389.3793271 GeV² μbarn, while this page uses 389.3793721389.3793721. What should you conclude?

Study aid derived from A. Bettini, Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics, 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press 2024 — published Open Access under CC-BY-NC 4.0, DOI 10.1017/9781009440745. Not the book: an independently written interactive companion, figures redrawn.